<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<!--  If you are running a bot please visit this policy page outlining rules you must respect. http://www.livejournal.com/bots/  -->
<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>Mondy&apos;s Adventure</title>
  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/</link>
  <description>Mondy&apos;s Adventure - LiveJournal.com</description>
  <managingEditor>ianmond@tpg.com.au</managingEditor>
  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 02:13:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / LiveJournal.com</generator>
  <lj:journal>mondyboy</lj:journal>
  <lj:journalid>5268838</lj:journalid>
  <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>
  

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/247387.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 02:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Sophie Z and the Ditmars 2013</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/247387.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;For those of you not on Twitter, Facebook or my contacts list, 9 days and three hours ago Sophie Zara Mond was born.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sister to a non plussed Joshi, (the cutest is when he asks her questions expecting answers like &amp;#8216;Why are you crying?&amp;#8221;) Sophie is currently being fed while I type this.  They say that having a second child is easier &amp;#8211; and maybe it is &amp;#8211; but even if that child is perfect it&amp;#8217;s still going to wake up at least three times a night.  And because I&amp;#8217;ve decided to be the supportive husband this time around, rather than the lazy &lt;em&gt;schlob&lt;/em&gt; I was with Joshi, I&amp;#8217;m waking up as well.  (Though, sometimes Jules has pity on me and let&amp;#8217;s me sleep through the last feed if I don&amp;#8217;t wake up on my own.  Thank you Jules).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All that tiredness and weariness aside, life is good.  Having a pigeon pair (where does that phrase come from?) is a blessing that I&amp;#8217;m thankful for.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So here&amp;#8217;s Sophie.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/20130428-114901.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/20130428-114901.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;20130428-114901.jpg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She&amp;#8217;s a spitting image of her brother Joshi at the same age who looked like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/20130428-115149.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/20130428-115149.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;20130428-115149.jpg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also something to be thankful is winning awards.  Last night Kirstyn and I won our second Ditmar for &lt;em&gt;Writer and The Critic&lt;/em&gt;.  To say I&amp;#8217;m happy would be a bit obvious, so instead I&amp;#8217;ll say I&amp;#8217;m proud and thank all those that nominated and voted for us.  Kirstyn made it clear, both in the acceptance speech and on Twitter, that she&amp;#8217;s keeping this award.  I&amp;#8217;m OK with that&amp;#8230; I just want my Lego Ditmar from 2012 in return.  (I believe they were being constructed at the award ceremony).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;d also like to congratulate everyone else who won.  Unless my Google-fu is shit, I can&amp;#8217;t seem to find a full listing of the winners on the interwebs.  So I stole the results from Tansy instead:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Novel: Sea Hearts, Margo Lanagan (Allen &amp;#038; Unwin)&lt;br /&gt;
Novella or Novelette: “Sky”, Kaaron Warren (Through Splintered Walls)&lt;br /&gt;
Short Story: “The Wisdom of Ants”, Thoraiya Dyer (Clarkesworld 12/12)&lt;br /&gt;
Collected Work: Through Splintered Walls, Kaaron Warren (Twelfth Planet)&lt;br /&gt;
Artwork: Cover art, Kathleen Jennings, for Midnight and Moonshine (Ticonderoga)&lt;br /&gt;
Fan Writer: Tansy Rayner Roberts, for body of work including reviews in Not If You Were The Last Short Story On Earth&lt;br /&gt;
Fan Artist: Kathleen Jennings, for body of work including “The Dalek Game” and “The Tamsyn Webb Sketchbook”&lt;br /&gt;
Fan Publication: The Writer and the Critic, Kirstyn McDermott and Ian Mond&lt;br /&gt;
New Talent: David McDonald&lt;br /&gt;
William Atheling Jr. Award for Criticism or Review: Tansy Rayner Roberts, for “Historically Authentic Sexism in Fantasy. Let’s Unpack That.” (Tor.com)&lt;br /&gt;
Norma K. Hemming Award: Sea Hearts, Margo Lanagan (Allen &amp;#038; Unwin)&lt;br /&gt;
Peter McNamara Award: Nick Stathopoulos&lt;br /&gt;
Chandler Award: Russell Farr (Ticonderoga)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Congrats to all those wonderful people &amp;#8211; including Tansy who won two Ditmars of her own for some brilliant fan writing.  Hopefully, she follows it up with a Hugo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Future blogging is likely to be sporadic for the next few months, but you can expect regular episodes of &lt;em&gt;Shooting the Poo&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Writer and The Critic&lt;/em&gt; from May.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=6052&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/247387.html</comments>
  <category>ditmar awards</category>
  <category>baby sophie</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>4</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/247157.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:04:03 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>I&amp;#8217;m A Shitty Podcaster</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/247157.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;All this talk about Hugos and Novellas and I&amp;#8217;ve forgotten to mention &lt;a href=&quot;http://writerandcritic.podbean.com/2013/03/29/episode-27-infinite-jest-and-house-of-leaves/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;that the latest episode of Writer and The Critic was released in late March.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;d like to thank Dave for allowing us to borrow his house for the recording.  The table we recorded on was very nice, especially the paisley tablecloth. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh, and thank you to Josh Gentry for saying nice things about the podcast on Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=6049&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/247157.html</comments>
  <category>writer and the critic</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>4</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/246809.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:58:34 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Reviewing the Nebulas: The Novellas</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/246809.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;OK, enough Hugo talk, let&amp;#8217;s get back to them Nebula Awards and specifically the Novellas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=6046#more-6046&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Read the rest of this entry &amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=6046&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/246809.html</comments>
  <category>nancy kress</category>
  <category>kenn liu</category>
  <category>jay lake</category>
  <category>lawrence m. schoen</category>
  <category>aliette de bodard</category>
  <category>robert reed</category>
  <category>nebulas</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/246632.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 10:52:40 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Hugo Thoughts (Part Three)</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/246632.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;So it&amp;#8217;s been over a week since the Hugo&amp;#8217;s were announced and we&amp;#8217;ve moved from blog posts &lt;em&gt;kvetching&lt;/em&gt; about the system &lt;a href=&quot;http://kevin-standlee.livejournal.com/1218724.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;to those having a crack at the &lt;em&gt;kvetchers&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://ruthlessculture.com/2013/04/06/how-to-fix-discussion-of-the-hugo-awards/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;more meta posts about moving beyond the &lt;em&gt;kvetching&lt;/em&gt; altogether.&lt;/a&gt; (A)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://whatever.scalzi.com/2013/04/05/my-hugo-nomination-and-other-hugo-related-thoughts/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;And theres been a post from John Scalzi.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What there&amp;#8217;s been very little of is actual discussion about the ballot &amp;#8211; other than endless wittering on the 5% rule and comments that the novel category is a bit rubbish.  I thought I&amp;#8217;d try and rectify this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) I thought &lt;em&gt;Chicks Unravel Time&lt;/em&gt; was an excellent book.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=751&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;It was the catalyst for my post about the lack of female writers working for Big Finish.&lt;/a&gt;  That said, on &lt;strong&gt;File 770&lt;/strong&gt; Martin Morse Wooster has the following to say:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;HOW will the Digging Chicks choose which one of their mighty books will inevitably win the Hugo for Related Book? Will they throw comics and DVDs at each other until one survives?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh that old phart fannish humour just cracks me up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) Best Graphic Story looks much better this year.  For one, &lt;em&gt;Saga&lt;/em&gt; is on the ballot &amp;#8211; I&amp;#8217;d have been one of the main &lt;em&gt;kvetchers&lt;/em&gt; if it hadn&amp;#8217;t appeared.  As far as I&amp;#8217;m concerned, it&amp;#8217;s head and shoulders the best ongoing series written in 2012.  It&amp;#8217;s nice to see &lt;em&gt;Saucer Country&lt;/em&gt; on the ballot.   I&amp;#8217;ve read every issue and am sad to see it&amp;#8217;s coming to end in the next month or so.  I think it&amp;#8217;s a comic that struggled to find its voice in its first few issues, but the last few have been great.  &lt;em&gt;Schlock Mercenary&lt;/em&gt; does fuck all for me.  I haven&amp;#8217;t read the Talbot and I&amp;#8217;m miles behind on &lt;em&gt;Locke and Key&lt;/em&gt;, but overall this bunch of nominees has given me hope for the long term future of the category.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(3) I&amp;#8217;ve seen four of the five moves in Best Dramatic Presentation &amp;#8211; Long Form.  There&amp;#8217;s a decent bunch of movies here, though I&amp;#8217;m disappointed that neither &lt;em&gt;Dredd&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;Argo&lt;/em&gt; made it.  For me, though, it has to be &lt;em&gt;The Avengers&lt;/em&gt; all the way (with &lt;em&gt;Looper&lt;/em&gt; in second place).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(4) If there&amp;#8217;s a category that&amp;#8217;s in dire need of been parked or at least given a big kick up the arse, it&amp;#8217;s Best Dramatic Presentation &amp;#8211; Short Form.  Look, I&amp;#8217;m a major Doctor Who fan.  Have the loved the show since I was six or seven.  But fuck me, &lt;em&gt;The Snowmen&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Asylum of the Daleks&lt;/em&gt;?!?!  Neither are actively bad stories, in fact I thought Snowmen had some nice moments, but every episode of &lt;em&gt;Archer&lt;/em&gt; and a good chunk of &lt;em&gt;Community&lt;/em&gt; was better than both those episodes.  That said, I don&amp;#8217;t mind seeing &lt;em&gt;The Angels Take Manhattan&lt;/em&gt; because I thought it was a fitting end for the Ponds and did draw a tear.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Fringe&lt;/em&gt; episode also isn&amp;#8217;t much chop, it&amp;#8217;s a season that seemed to end with a whimper.  And I didn&amp;#8217;t watch any of Season 2 of &lt;em&gt;Game of Thrones&lt;/em&gt;.  But fuck me, as a life long Doctor Who fan it&amp;#8217;s embarrassing to see another three Doctor Who episodes feature in this category again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(5) Best Editor &amp;#8211; Short Form.  Many of the same names as we saw last year.  Many will be pushing for Schmidt to win a Hugo (I believe he&amp;#8217;s never won one).  But years of service shouldn&amp;#8217;t be a reason to win a rocket.  It should be based on what you produced in 2012.  I think you can guess that I&amp;#8217;m not a fan of &lt;em&gt;Analog&lt;/em&gt; and its output.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In anycase, for me it&amp;#8217;s Jonathan.  He hasn&amp;#8217;t won a Hugo either, and given his significant and high quality output for 2012 it&amp;#8217;s about bloody time he went home with a rocket.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(6) Best Editor &amp;#8211; Long Form.  I don&amp;#8217;t know how people nominate for this category.  They obviously do a hell of a lot more research about who edits what then I do.  Or, in other words, I don&amp;#8217;t have a horse in this race.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(7) Talking about horses and races, I have no opinion on either Best Pro or Fan Artist.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(8) Fantastic to see &lt;em&gt;Strange Horizons&lt;/em&gt; feature for Best Semi-Prozine.  It produces great fiction, great blogs and some of the best reviews anywhere on the interwebs.  But this is a tough category to win.  I mean, &lt;em&gt;Locus&lt;/em&gt; who appeared last year don&amp;#8217;t feature at all&amp;#8230; (or is this because of a rule change?)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(9) I&amp;#8217;m running out of puff and yet I&amp;#8217;m getting to three categories that interest me most.  Best Fanzine, Best Fan Writer and Best Fancast.  I&amp;#8217;m bloody stoked that Tansy Rayner Roberts has been nominated for Best Fan Writer.  But then you&amp;#8217;ll have guessed that if you&amp;#8217;ve read my Ditmar post.  That said, I didn&amp;#8217;t nominate Tansy.  That&amp;#8217;s because she&amp;#8217;s a pro.  Not that I have a problem with pros appearing in this category.  I think it&amp;#8217;s ridiculous to think that just because you&amp;#8217;re a pro you should be discriminated against.  Just read Tansy&amp;#8217;s posts and you&amp;#8217;ll see she bleeds fan.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But like my mate Macca, I decided to keep my fan writing nominations to fans who are also not authors.  Of course none of the appeared.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(10) When I look at Best Fan Writer and Best Fanzine and I can absolutely see why the &lt;em&gt;kvetching&lt;/em&gt; noted above occurs.  There&amp;#8217;s some magnificent blogs out there featuring great fan writing that doesn&amp;#8217;t get recognised by the Hugos because of this knee jerk animosity to the digital world.  You don&amp;#8217;t believe me, just take this comment from Rich Lynch:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I guess we didn’t do a good enough job getting the Fanzine category redefined.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He&amp;#8217;s referring to the appearance of two websites in the category.  And I know he&amp;#8217;s not a lone voice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(11) While it&amp;#8217;s only Best Fancasts second year, this ballot is a cut and paste of last years.  If we see the same five podcasts appear next year, then I think there will be genuine concern for the future of this category.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(12)  That said, I do adore both &lt;em&gt;Galactic Suburbia&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Coode Street&lt;/em&gt;.  Can they both win?   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(13) I don&amp;#8217;t have much to say in regard to the Campbells other than the fact that I&amp;#8217;ve heard very good things about Zen Cho.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#8217;s enough&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(A) Actually that linked post from may mate Macca (apparently he hates being called that) is the best of the lot.  Because putting aside his comments on the insular perception of old fart fandom, he&amp;#8217;s actually quite constructive in terms of moving forward.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=6045&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/246632.html</comments>
  <category>hugo awards</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>2</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/246403.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:35:56 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Hugo Thoughts (Part Two)</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/246403.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday saw another &lt;a href=&quot;http://aidanmoher.com/blog/2013/04/articles/my-thoughts-on-the-2013-hugo-nominations/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;interesting post&lt;/a&gt; on this years Hugo ballot by &lt;em&gt;Dribble of Ink&amp;#8217;s&lt;/em&gt;Aidan Moher.  In the comments to his well thought out piece, Shan states that:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;There’s a lot of posting going on this year about the Hugos but it all comes back to the same point: this is a popularity contest. It’s never been about worthiness. The only way you’re going to get worthiness is by making it a juried award involving some poor unfortunates having to read everything which is eligible, and even then it will be “worthy according to their particular tastes”.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This argument often pops us when someone dares to criticise who was nominated.  Yes it&amp;#8217;s a popularity award.  Yes the Hugos are not about worthiness per se.  But that doesn&amp;#8217;t mean we shouldn&amp;#8217;t question or critique the choices made by the Hugo nominating public.  There&amp;#8217;s no right answer, but by having the discussion, by noting &amp;#8211; as Aidan does &amp;#8211; other books that should have appeared on the ballot, the dialogue is kept alive and the Hugos becomes something more than just a static list of nominees.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I go back to another popular voted award, the Ditmars, and how that&amp;#8217;s changed over the last decade since fans in Australia started taking note of issues such as gender bias.  You only need to compare the results of the last 5 years to those of the previous 5 years in all the fiction categories to see that there&amp;#8217;s been a shift in the nomination process &amp;#8211; one that is more gender balanced.  And that&amp;#8217;s because fan treated the Ditmar ballots as a living document and something worth discussing &amp;#8211; even if some of those conversations got a &lt;a href=&quot;http://robinpen.livejournal.com/23942.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;little&amp;#8230; bit&amp;#8230; heated.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On a lighter note, these rants, for lack of a better word, have become so common place that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jimchines.com/2013/03/grumbling-about-the-hugo-awards/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jim Hines decided to take the piss out of them&lt;/a&gt; before they started appearing on the interwebs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was going to talk about the actual ballot, but I&amp;#8217;ll leave my thoughts on the remaining categories for another night.  I&amp;#8217;ve got episodes of Archer to watch!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=6044&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/246403.html</comments>
  <category>hugo awards</category>
  <category>the ditmar award</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/246066.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 02:47:23 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Hugo Thoughts (Part One)</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/246066.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;On his blog, &lt;em&gt;Staffer&amp;#8217;s Book Review&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.staffersbookreview.com/2013/04/can-we-stop-talking-about-the-hugos-now.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Justin Landon describes the Hugo Awards as utter twaddle.&lt;/a&gt;  I understand the frustration.  One look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehugoawards.org/hugo-history/2013-hugo-awards/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this years ballot&lt;/a&gt; and you can&amp;#8217;t but be overcome by a feeling of &lt;em&gt;deja vu&lt;/em&gt;.  The titles of the novels or stories might be different, but the names look awfully familiar.  Yes, there&amp;#8217;s the odd surprise &amp;#8211; Saladin Ahmed and Tansy Rayner Roberts &amp;#8211; but overall it&amp;#8217;s a ballot you could have picked in your sleep.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Landon&amp;#8217;s response is to give-up on the Hugos all together and never discuss them again.  Like I said, I can appreciate where he&amp;#8217;s coming from.  But I take the opposite view.  I want to discuss each category.  I want to kick up a fuss where a fuss might be required.  Or acknowledge the awards when, in my humble, it gets things right.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And why do I bother?  Because I love the Hugos.  Even when it keeps disappointing me. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#8217;s lots of categories and my thoughts are lengthy so I&amp;#8217;m splitting them into three parts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) I haven&amp;#8217;t read any of the Best Novels, though I intend to rectify that over the coming months (well at least with the three standalones.  I might use this as an opportunity to catch up with Seanan&amp;#8217;s Newsflesh series).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) &lt;em&gt;2312&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8216;s appearance comes as no surprise &amp;#8211; it was the most hyped SF novel of last year and harks back to the WOW! GOSH! engineering roots of the genre.  Bujold, Grant and Scalzi are populist nominations due to having strong fanbases (and not a SMOFdom conspiracy as some have suggested).  The appearance of &lt;em&gt;Throne of The Crescent Moon&lt;/em&gt; is a genuine surprise and its great to have diversity of voices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(3) But does this Best Novel category fill me with love?  No, it doesn&amp;#8217;t.  Granted I haven&amp;#8217;t read the nominated books (or for that matter many 2012 novels), but I do wonder whether any of these novels will have a lasting legacy on the genre.  Maybe 2312?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(4) I&amp;#8217;ve now read three of the novellas, and unless the Grant and Sanderson are something special, Aliette de Bodard should romp home in this category.  The Kress is an enjoyable page turner, and the Lake is the best thing of his I&amp;#8217;ve read (though it&amp;#8217;s got a number of problems) but the de Bodard is the sort of crunchy writing, filled with ideas and world building, that should be winning Hugos.  Also, seeing Aliette&amp;#8217;s story on the ballot gives me hope that the Hugos are more than just measuring who has the most popular fanbase.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(5) &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=4104&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I&amp;#8217;ve only read the Valente and I thought it was brilliant&lt;/a&gt;.  As I haven&amp;#8217;t read the other four it&amp;#8217;s hard for me to pass judgement.  But I thought very highly of the novelette Nebula nominees, so these four stories (two by Seanan McGuire) have a high benchmark to reach.  Again, I&amp;#8217;ll be reading these over the coming months.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(6) The big controversy for this years ballot was the fact that only three short stories feature on the ballot.  I understand why people have cracked the sads over this.  The optics don&amp;#8217;t look good, as if the Hugo voting public doesn&amp;#8217;t give a shit about short fiction.  But we all know there&amp;#8217;s no conspiracy here.  The 5% rule, whether you like it or not, has been around for ages.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(7)  Of course all this babble about 5% rules means that we&amp;#8217;re not paying attention to the excellent fiction that was nominated.  I haven&amp;#8217;t read the Johnson, but the Liu and de Bodard are two wonderful stories, both worthy of appearing on any ballot.  (It&amp;#8217;s a crime that &lt;em&gt;Mono No Aware&lt;/em&gt; didn&amp;#8217;t appear on the Nebula short list).  For me it&amp;#8217;s a toss of a coin choice, but I&amp;#8221;d probably pick the Liu over Aliette&amp;#8217;s excellent piece.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=5633&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/246066.html</comments>
  <category>hugo awards</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/245979.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 01:52:46 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Some Thoughts on the Ditmars</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/245979.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#8217;d think that with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lonestarcon3.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hugo nominees being announced today&lt;/a&gt; I&amp;#8217;d get on the bandwagon and put in my two bobs worth.  But jingoism precludes any sort of international award and so the &lt;a href=&quot;http://ditmars.sf.org.au/2013/2013_Ditmar_ballot.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ditmar ballot comes first&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1)  I know I&amp;#8217;d rather be cynical and sarcastic, but what a great novel list.  &lt;em&gt;Sea Hearts&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Bitter Greens&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Perfections&lt;/em&gt; &amp;#8211; the three books I&amp;#8217;ve read &amp;#8211; are all worthy award winners.  If I had to choose &amp;#8211; and it&amp;#8217;s seriously a toss of a three sided coin &amp;#8211; my vote would be with &lt;em&gt;Perfections&lt;/em&gt;.  And this isn&amp;#8217;t me showing loyalty to my podcast homey. &lt;em&gt;Perfections&lt;/em&gt; is a magnificent psychological horror novel that really got under my thick skin. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2)  That said, &lt;em&gt;Sea Hearts&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Bitter Greens&lt;/em&gt; are brilliant as well.  And I&amp;#8217;m a little shitty that &lt;em&gt;Sea Hearts&lt;/em&gt; didn&amp;#8217;t get some Hugo love.  (World Fantasy Award, I&amp;#8217;m now looking at you).  As much as I&amp;#8217;ll be voting &lt;em&gt;Perfections&lt;/em&gt; I see &lt;em&gt;Sea Hearts&lt;/em&gt; winning.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(3) As for the other three books &amp;#8211; well I&amp;#8217;ve mentioned my shame previously of not reading Jason&amp;#8217;s novella.  The Battersby and the Anderton are books I own and are on the TBR pile (well, book one of the Anderton).  Will I ever read them?  1,500 books in the garage aside&amp;#8230; I can&amp;#8217;t put my hand on the heart and say I will.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(4) I haven&amp;#8217;t read the Ditmar rules, but I&amp;#8217;m going to assume that &lt;em&gt;Salvage&lt;/em&gt; is too long to be in the novella category.  I&amp;#8217;ve read &lt;em&gt;Significant Dust&lt;/em&gt; by Margo and, unlike everyone else, didn&amp;#8217;t like it very much.  &lt;em&gt;Bajazzle&lt;/em&gt; is my favourite Margo story from &lt;em&gt;Cracklescape&lt;/em&gt; but it doesn&amp;#8217;t appear.  In anycase, the Warren is on my TBR pile (because I really do want to read all the Twelve Planet books.  By the way, the cover to Asymmetry by Thoraiya Dyer is gorgeous).   I don&amp;#8217;t believe I&amp;#8217;ve read anything by Simon Petrie &amp;#8211; at least nothing recently &amp;#8211; what are peoples thoughts on &lt;em&gt;Flight 404&lt;/em&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(5) I&amp;#8217;ve read &lt;em&gt;Wisdom of Ants&lt;/em&gt; and reviewed it on the &lt;em&gt;Last Short Story&lt;/em&gt; podcast.  I remember saying nice things about it without being blow away.  I&amp;#8217;d be interested to know what you guys thought of the other three.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(6) While I admit I&amp;#8217;ve only read one of the Collected Works &amp;#8211; I think it&amp;#8217;s safe to say that Australian small press is healthy in terms of the quality of the work produced.  I also think that Australian small press should be proud in meeting the aim of exposing us readers to more work from female writers.  Except for the Simon Petrie novella, every single nomination in novella, short story and collected work features a female writer or editor.  I don&amp;#8217;t believe this sort of representation exists anywhere else in the world. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(7) And&amp;#8230; and&amp;#8230; a good chunk of that work written by women is actually Science Fiction.  With science.  And everything.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(8) I&amp;#8217;ve previously mentioned my love for Grant&amp;#8217;s fan writing.  Tansy&amp;#8230; well she&amp;#8217;s been nominated for a Hugo because she writes with passion and from the heart.  Alex is one of the best Aussie reviewers and Sean&amp;#8230; there&amp;#8217;s no one more hard-working in the genre than Sean.  He&amp;#8217;s the Charles Tan of Australia, doing everything in his power to promote Australian work &amp;#8211; and works from non Western cultures &amp;#8211; through his blog and podcasts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(9) I love Kathleen&amp;#8217;s art but maybe we need to start considering parking a category if there&amp;#8217;s only one nominee.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(10) Thank you Ditmar people for nominating &lt;em&gt;Writer and the Critic&lt;/em&gt; and the &lt;em&gt;2012 Snapshot&lt;/em&gt;.  But for me it&amp;#8217;s Coode Street all the way.  Jonathan and Gary have had an amazing year in terms of the breadth of people they interviewed.  And after 138 episodes, their rambling is still worth listening too.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(11) BUT WHERE IS BOXCUTTERS?!?!?!?!?!?!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(12) Thoughts on Best New Talent? &amp;#8211; coz I have none.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(13) As much as this is a strong year for the Atheling, Tansy&amp;#8217;s article, “Historically Authentic Sexism in Fantasy. Let&amp;#8217;s Unpack That&amp;#8221; gets me vote.  It&amp;#8217;s a fucking brilliant piece that deserved its wider recognition on &lt;em&gt;tor.com&lt;/em&gt; and body slams the notion that failing to have empowered women in medieval fantasy is OK because they didn&amp;#8217;t exist in history.  I quote:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;History is not a long series of centuries in which men did all the interesting/important things and women stayed home and twiddled their thumbs in between pushing out babies, making soup and dying in childbirth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;History is actually a long series of centuries of men writing down what they thought was important and interesting, and FORGETTING TO WRITE ABOUT WOMEN. It’s also a long series of centuries of women’s work and women’s writing being actively denigrated by men. Writings were destroyed, contributions were downplayed, and women were actively oppressed against, absolutely.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(14) Overall, it&amp;#8217;s pretty hard to be cynical about this years Ditmar ballot.  Jingoism gags aside, when I see a list as strong as this I do feel Aussie pride.  Congrats to all!!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=5117&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/245979.html</comments>
  <category>ditmar awards</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>2</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/245632.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Some Brief Thoughts on the Aurealis Awards Nominations</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/245632.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Last night or early this morning (all I know is it was in my inbox this morning) the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aurealisawards.com/media-release_finalists-March-2013.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Aurealis Awards&lt;/a&gt; nominees were announced.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some brief thoughts:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) I see 6 science fiction novels, 4 of which are written by women.  Wasn&amp;#8217;t it proven on the internet with maths that women don&amp;#8217;t write science fiction?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) Margo Lanagan features heavily on the ballot &amp;#8211; and so she should &amp;#8211; but where is &lt;em&gt;Cracklescape&lt;/em&gt; for best collection?  It looks like three out of the four stories in the book feature on the ballot.  So was it deemed that as a collection it wasn&amp;#8217;t substantial enough?  Am I missing something here?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(3) Kirstyn and Jason will pretend to be all lovey dovey about appearing on the Horror Novel ballot together.  They might even post something nauseating about it online.  It&amp;#8217;s bullshit. You can be sure that those smiles hide razor sharp teeth and the desire to rip each others throat out. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(4) The Best Fantasy Novel category has two extraordinary books that feature on my Hugo ballot &amp;#8211; &lt;em&gt;Sea Hearts&lt;/em&gt; by Margo Lanagan and &lt;em&gt;Bitter Greens&lt;/em&gt; by Kate Forsyth.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(5) Like all good ballots, this one has produced a bunch of writers whose works I&amp;#8217;m not familiar with. Specifically, Jo Spurrier, Nina D’Aleo, Ambelin Kwaymullina, Greg Mellor and Jason Franks.  Anyone got opinions on these guys?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(6) I really need to read Jo Anderton at some point&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(7) I think it&amp;#8217;s brilliant that there are two anthologies edited by three women on the ballot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(8) And while it&amp;#8217;s easy to just pencil in Jonathan&amp;#8217;s name in the Anthology category, I know he works fucking hard on those books.  He&amp;#8217;s not featured three times because he&amp;#8217;s a world renowned editor.  He&amp;#8217;s featured three times because his anthologies are genuinely brilliant.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(9) Talking about brilliant, that Collection list might be missing Margo, but it&amp;#8217;s still gob-smackingly good in terms of the writers featured.  Martin Livings, in particular, is someone who I don&amp;#8217;t think gets enough kudos for his short fiction.  Also lovely to see K J Bishop back on an AA ballot. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(10) Also to The Brains, Hannett and Slatter, I really need to read your collection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Finally, the above thoughts might seem like a bit of a love-fest, but genuinely I&amp;#8217;m proud of the diverse and varied writers in this country and the work they produce.  (I even read more Australian work in 2012, which I&amp;#8217;m happy about).  Also, like I said last year, it&amp;#8217;s fantastic to see Australian small press thrive, ensuring that these diverse voices see the light of day.  As an example, once it&amp;#8217;s finished I think the Twelve Planets series will considered a landmark publishing event in our genre.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=4750&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/245632.html</comments>
  <category>aurealis awards</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>1</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/245365.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:09:22 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Reviewing the Nebulas: Novelettes</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/245365.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Seven novelettes were nominated for the Nebulas this year and I have to say that apart from one dud they&amp;#8217;re a shiny crop of stories.  Moreso then the nominated short fiction, I expect to see a few of these novelettes appear on the Hugo ballot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=4104#more-4104&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Read the rest of this entry &amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=4104&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/245365.html</comments>
  <category>catherine asaro</category>
  <category>lois tilton</category>
  <category>rachel swirsky</category>
  <category>meghan mccarron</category>
  <category>brit mandelo</category>
  <category>sfwa</category>
  <category>clarkesworld</category>
  <category>tor.com</category>
  <category>cat valente</category>
  <category>ken liu</category>
  <category>andy duncan</category>
  <category>asimovs</category>
  <category>reviews</category>
  <category>nebulas</category>
  <category>f&amp;amp;sf</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/245231.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 06:10:09 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>The Veronica Mars Kickstarter Mishigas</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/245231.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;While I genuinely don&amp;#8217;t have a horse, dog or other animal in this race,  I&amp;#8217;m fascinated by the whole &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/559914737/the-veronica-mars-movie-project&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Veronica Mars Kickstarter thing&lt;/a&gt;.  So fascinated that I&amp;#8217;ve got some questions(1).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(A)  Is Warner Brothers actually going to put any money into this venture?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(B) Assuming that WB isn&amp;#8217;t providing a cent, did Rob Thomas actually believe that he could make a film for $2 million?  I know it&amp;#8217;s possible &amp;#8211; shit you can make a film for $10,000 or less &amp;#8211; but I&amp;#8217;m assuming the cast and crew expected to get paid.  As it is, it&amp;#8217;s a moot question given he raised that money in 10 hours.  But I am curious to know whether Thomas went into this with a planned $2 million budget.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(C)  Now that the Kickstarter is open to Canada (and assuming it&amp;#8217;s subsequently open to other territories), there&amp;#8217;s a chance that Thomas will raise $10 million.  That&amp;#8217;s pretty cool.  Now, the normal business model would be to make a film for as a little as possible.  And maybe Rob Thomas&amp;#8217; script only requires a maximum budget of $5 million. So, if he does raise up to $10 million, will the Kickstarter process compel him to use all that money?  And would fans feel betrayed if they found out that Rob Thomas (and Warner Brothers) had pocketed a chunk of the cash? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(D) And finally, if Thomas does use all the money raised, how does he expect to make a profit given that the bulk of fans interested in the movie will have already paid upfront?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What would be interesting is if Thomas, after hitting a mark of about $5 million, actually closed down the Kickstarter because he&amp;#8217;d more then reached his budget goal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As they say, interesting times&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) If you want to read actual opinion, have a look at these &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/index.php/people-say-dumb-things-about-kickstarter/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;two&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/index.php/a-little-more-about-the-veronica-mars-kickstarter/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;posts&lt;/a&gt; from Harry Connolly.  The second posts also links to other interesting discussions on the topic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=3802&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/245231.html</comments>
  <category>harry connolly</category>
  <category>kickstarter</category>
  <category>veronica mars</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>7</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/244846.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:14:21 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>I Heart Martin Lewis and this is why&amp;#8230;</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/244846.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;If you want to understand why I keep banging on about Martin Lewis as a reviewer then read his recent review on Strange Horizons of: &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.strangehorizons.com/reviews/2013/03/science_fiction.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Science Fiction: The 101 Best Novels, 1985-2010 by Damien Broderick and Paul Di Filippo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don&amp;#8217;t be deterred by the fact that the piece is long, has 19 footnotes and is about a book you&amp;#8217;re never likely to read.  This is great shit, written with insight, a knowledge of the field, supporting evidence and a heathy serving of wit.  I&amp;#8217;ve been giggling in bed reading it leading to Jules kicking me where it hurts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=3639&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/244846.html</comments>
  <category>reviews</category>
  <category>martin lewis</category>
  <category>strange horizons</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/244620.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Big Finish and Gender Issues &amp;#8211; Another Redux</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/244620.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://docohobigfinish.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/nicholas-briggs-interview-update.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A few weeks back Doc Oho interviewed Nick Briggs about his five years in the chair as Executive Producer of Big Finish. &lt;/a&gt; it&amp;#8217;s a good interview and worth the read.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the questions Doc Oho asked was:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;There has been a discussion recently on Gallifrey Base with regards to there being a lack of female writers contributing stories. Is there a submissions policy with regards to the various ranges or are all the slots allocated internally? Is there any way that Big Finish could seek out fresh female talent?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nick Briggs&amp;#8217;s response was:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The issue of skewing opportunity to favour unrepresented groups in any creative field is a really difficult one. We have an ongoing discussion about this in Big  Finish circles. We are certainly very keen for there to be more female writers, for example. But we are a small company with tough deadlines, so actually managing to get scripts from anyone in the first place has to be the major concern. That said, I’m very mindful of this issue and the justified strength of feeling from people who feel under-represented, so I am certainly making efforts to change things. I think there’s a very valid argument that like prefers like, so I think there’s some truth in the fact that I may unconsciously be drawn towards people who are like me &amp;#8211; white, male, etc. That’s certainly not a conscious choice of mine. So I hope that the more I consider this issue, the more capable I will be of doing something more positive about it. But, as I say, because time is always short and deadlines are always tight, my major concern is just getting the best stuff out there. I don’t ever want to be in a situation where I would have to put a brilliant idea or script to one side because the sex or race of the writer didn’t meet certain criteria.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s the beginning of an excellent answer &amp;#8211; showing quite a bit of self awareness &amp;#8211; which is then completely ruined when Nick says, &amp;#8220;I don&amp;#8217;t ever want to be in a situation where I would have to put a brilliant idea or script to one side because the sex or race of the writer didn&amp;#8217;t meet certain criteria.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why do people say this sort of shit?  There&amp;#8217;s no Government or fannish mandate to force Big Finish to publish more stories by female writers.  All that&amp;#8217;s being asked is that Big Finish consider increasing representation by women from about 2% to something bigger than 2%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reasons Nick gives as to why &amp;#8216;publishing more stuff by women&amp;#8217; isn&amp;#8217;t an easy problem to solve overnight seem fair to me.  I&amp;#8217;m the last person to judge or comment on the constant pressures that Big Finish face to produce content.  But for fucks sake, don&amp;#8217;t derail genuine gender concerns by invoking the quota boogeyman.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=3635&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/244620.html</comments>
  <category>nick briggs</category>
  <category>doc oho</category>
  <category>big finish</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>1</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/244333.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:05:54 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Reviewing The Nebulas: The Short Stories</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/244333.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Although I&amp;#8217;m not a member of SFWA(1), I thought I&amp;#8217;d review a couple of the award categories starting with short fiction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, because I&amp;#8217;m shit at story summaries, I&amp;#8217;m going to be relying on online sources &amp;#8211; mostly Lois Tilton.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Behind the cut, it&amp;#8217;s on with the reviews.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=2899#more-2899&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Read the rest of this entry &amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=2899&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/244333.html</comments>
  <category>lois tilton</category>
  <category>tom crosshill</category>
  <category>lightspeed</category>
  <category>maria dahvana headley</category>
  <category>asimov magazine</category>
  <category>sfwa</category>
  <category>clarkesworld</category>
  <category>aliette de bodard</category>
  <category>leah cypess</category>
  <category>ken liu</category>
  <category>helena bell</category>
  <category>reviews</category>
  <category>cat rambo</category>
  <category>nebulas</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/244081.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 06:05:32 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Nick Hornby knows what he speaks of</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/244081.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m super behind on my reading of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.believermag.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Believer Magazine&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, only just finishing the January 2011 edition.  But on page 74 of the issue Nick Hornby, in his monthly column &lt;em&gt;Stuff I&amp;#8217;ve Been Reading&lt;/em&gt; speaks the truth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The advantages and benefits of writing a monthly column about reading for the &lt;em&gt;Believer&lt;/em&gt;are innumerable, if predictable: fame, women (it&amp;#8217;s amazing what people will do to get early information about the &amp;#8220;Books Bought&amp;#8221; list), international influence, and so on. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But perhaps the biggest perk of all, one that has only emerged slowly, over the years, is this: you can&amp;#8217;t read long books.  Well, I can&amp;#8217;t, anyway.  I probably read between two and three hundred pages, I&amp;#8217;m guessing, during the average working week, and I have the impression &amp;#8211; please correct me if I&amp;#8217;m wrong &amp;#8211; that if you saw only one book in the &amp;#8220;Book Read&amp;#8221; list at the top [of the column] it would be very hard to persuade you to plough through what would, in effect, be a two-thousand-word book review.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And as a consequence, there are all sorts of intimidating-looking eight-hundred-pagers that I feel completely justified in overlooking.  I am ignoring them for your benefit, effectively, although it would be disingenuous to claim that I spend my month resenting you.  On the contrary, there have been times when, watching friends or fellow passengers struggling through some au courant literary monster, I have wanted to kiss you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8230; And in any case, long, slow books can have a disastrous, demoralizing effect on your cultural life if you have young children and your reading time is short.  You make only tiny inroads into the chunky white wastes every night before falling asleep, and before long you become convinced that it&amp;#8217;s not really worth reading again until your children are in reform school.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OK, maybe I&amp;#8217;ve gone overboard with that quote, the important bit is the last paragraph, but, you know, context and Hornby&amp;#8217;s columns in &lt;em&gt;The Believer&lt;/em&gt; are a highlight (1).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The thing is, at this point in my life I&amp;#8217;m lucky if I read more then 40 pages of a novel a day.  Normally, it&amp;#8217;s a good chunk less then that and there are nights &amp;#8211; God forgive me &amp;#8211;  where I don&amp;#8217;t read anything at all.  As for his comments about the &amp;#8216;chunky white wastes&amp;#8217;, I can&amp;#8217;t tell you how many times &lt;em&gt;Consider Phlebas&lt;/em&gt; fell from my fingertips as I began drifting off to sleep (2).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hornby&amp;#8217;s also right about those massive novels that feel like too much work.  He&amp;#8217;s talking about literary classics, I&amp;#8217;m talking about 90% of the fantasy genre.  I never had a problem with the bookstop when I was in my 20s &amp;#8211; shit, I&amp;#8217;m the only person on the planet who likes Stephen King&amp;#8217;s &lt;em&gt;Insomnia&lt;/em&gt; &amp;#8211; but now with a Joshi Ethan Mond in my life and a second, all going well, on the way, any free time I once had &amp;#8211; especially on the weekend &amp;#8211; has vanished.  And here I am, a curmudgeonly old bastard who wishes the publishing industry would tell genre authors that a 250 page fantasy novel is perfectly OK.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anywho, there&amp;#8217;s no moral or mission statement in this post.  I mean, it&amp;#8217;s not long I&amp;#8217;m actually going to stop reading long books.  Unlike Hornby I don&amp;#8217;t write a column (3).  But I know that the days where I&amp;#8217;d read 70 or 80 books a year are gone &amp;#8211; at least for the next 20 years.  If I can read more then 25 I&amp;#8217;ll be happy. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) But Jack Pendarvis&amp;#8217; column is the bit I hang out for.  Fuck he&amp;#8217;s funny.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) It&amp;#8217;s a fuckload more expensive when you&amp;#8217;re reading on the iPad and it slips from your fingers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(3) And I&amp;#8217;d like to read 2312, even if James Nicoll loathes it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=2508&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/244081.html</comments>
  <category>nick hornby</category>
  <category>the believer magazine</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>4</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/243789.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 09:20:29 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Tiptree Awards</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/243789.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tiptree.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Most of you who read this blog will know that the Tiptree Award for 2012 was announced a day or so back.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m super excited to see that the award has gone to &lt;em&gt;The Drowning Girl&lt;/em&gt; &amp;#8211; joint winner with Kiini Ibura Salaam&amp;#8217;s collection of stories. &lt;em&gt;Ancient, Ancient&lt;/em&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kirstyn and I, with our special guest star Jonathan Strahan, reviewed &lt;em&gt;The Drowning Girl&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt; on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://writerandcritic.podbean.com/2012/07/20/episode-21-akata-witch-and-the-drowning-girl-plus-galveston/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Writer and the Critic podcast back in June 2012&lt;/a&gt;  And back then we all said that the book needed to be on the Tiptree ballot.  Which was possibly a bit rude of us, but it&amp;#8217;s a book all three of us felt strongly about.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hopefully, the Tiptrees should be the first of many nominees and awards for The Drowning Girl&lt;/em&gt;.  I expect to see it on the World Fantasy and Shirley Jackson ballots.  And while I think it will struggle to get on the Hugo ballot, I certainly nominated it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The great thing about awards like The Tiptree is that they introduce you to writers and works that normally wouldn&amp;#8217;t appear on your radar.  In this case it was Kiini Ibura Salaam&amp;#8217;s &lt;em&gt;Ancient, Ancient&lt;em&gt;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cheryl-morgan.com/?p=16197&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I went straight to Wizard Tower books and bought myself a lovely ecopy.&lt;/a&gt;  Congratulations should also go to Aqueduct Press for publishing high quality fiction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of the other nominees, I own all of them, except for the Wells and the Wheeler, but haven&amp;#8217;t actually read any of them.  If only there was more time&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway, congratulations to everyone!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=2329&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/243789.html</comments>
  <category>jonathan strahan</category>
  <category>writer and the critic</category>
  <category>kirstyn mcdermott</category>
  <category>tiptree awards</category>
  <category>the drowning girl</category>
  <category>kiini ibura salaam</category>
  <category>caitlin r kiernan</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/243570.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 09:56:27 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>HUGO HUGO HUGO (and best fan writer)</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/243570.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;So I&amp;#8217;ve just submitted my nominations for the Hugo Awards.  I know I can update them over the next few days, but unless something suddenly pops into my head, it&amp;#8217;s unlikely I&amp;#8217;ll be adding anything.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A few days back I mentioned the &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=753&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;comics I&amp;#8217;d be nominating&lt;/a&gt;, so I thought I&amp;#8217;d inspire you with the fan writers I&amp;#8217;ve put on my list.  They are:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	&lt;a href=&quot;http://wrongquestions.blogspot.com.au/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Abigail Nussbaum &lt;/a&gt;	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	&lt;a href=&quot;http://angriest.blogspot.com.au/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Grant Watson&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	&lt;a href=&quot;http://requireshate.wordpress.com/author/acrackedmoon/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;acrackedmoon&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	&lt;a href=&quot;http://everythingisnice.wordpress.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Martin Lewis&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.strangehorizons.com/reviews/2012/01/theft_of_swords.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Liz Bourke&lt;/a&gt; (I&amp;#8217;ve linked to her review of &lt;em&gt;Theft of Swords&lt;/em&gt; because it&amp;#8217;s a great example of how an excellent review can generate discussion &amp;#8211; even if most of it is heated.  But Liz has written many fine reviews).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ve spoken in the past about how much I enjoy these writers so it should be no surprise that I&amp;#8217;m nominating them.  But it&amp;#8217;s worth noting that none of my potential nominees have ever appeared on a Hugo list and it&amp;#8217;s time we saw some variety, some fresh voices on the ballot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=2196&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/243570.html</comments>
  <category>hugo awards</category>
  <category>acrackedmoon</category>
  <category>abigail nussbaum</category>
  <category>grant watson</category>
  <category>martin lewis</category>
  <category>liz bourke</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/243343.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:49:27 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Review: Consider Phlebas by Iain M Banks</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/243343.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Goodreads figures: 15506 ratings at an average of 3.87&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I&amp;#8217;m reading Martin Lewis&amp;#8217; blog (&lt;em&gt;Everything Is Nice&lt;/em&gt;) and he&amp;#8217;s ripping into Hartwell and Cramer&amp;#8217;s introduction of a Gregory Benford story.*  During the evisceration, mention is made of early New Space Opera from authors such as Banks and Colin Greenland.  And it occurs to me that while I own books by these authors, I&amp;#8217;ve never actually read them.**&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At this point the words of podcast maestros Messrs Wolfe and Strahan ring out.***  Just because I&amp;#8217;m not literate on the beginning of New Space Opera, doesn&amp;#8217;t mean I need to read those books.  But I felt this itching in the back of my head (I should probably have just scratched) and the next thing you know I&amp;#8217;m blowing off the dust of my copy of &lt;em&gt;Consider Phlebas&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think the brilliant Abigail Nussbaum sums it up well when she concludes that with its, &lt;a href=&quot;http://wrongquestions.blogspot.com.au/2006/05/consider-phlebas-by-iain-m-banks.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&amp;#8220;unskilled, humorless prose, indifferent characterization, preachy and obvious philosophy&amp;#8211;by almost every criteria Consider Phlebas is a flawed, perhaps even failed novel.&amp;#8221;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
As she also points out, it&amp;#8217;s a novel with a very thin plot that muddles around for the first 250 pages or so, more interested in world building and philosophy then telling an actual story.  The book has this tendency to lurch from one &amp;#8220;OH MY GOD&amp;#8221; set piece to another, making me wonder whether &lt;em&gt;Consider Phlebas&lt;/em&gt; was a fix-up novel.****&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s not helped that the characterisation of Horza Gobuchul, the novel&amp;#8217;s main protagonist, never feels fully fleshed out or consistent.  I think the idea is that he&amp;#8217;s a James Bond type, a shape shifter performing missions for the Idirans in their galaxy spanning war against The Culture.  And while he seems mostly competent, the first time we meet him he&amp;#8217;s chained to a wall about to be drowned in sewage.  A little later on, after being handed his mission from the Idirans, he gets stuck out in space only to be picked up by a bunch of Privateers.  In fact, the main reason why the novel does stumble around is because Horza is unable to get back on track with his mission.  It&amp;#8217;s only after he escapes an island of cannibals on a doomed orbital*****, that the book starts to build momentum.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The secondary characters fare no better, though there is an attempt on the part of Banks to make Yalson, the main love interest, vaguely symapethic and believable.  The problem is that Horza treats her like an irrational female, when he isn&amp;#8217;t abusing the trust between them.  Worst of all (and this is a spoiler) in the space of about twenty pages she reveals she&amp;#8217;s pregnant &amp;#8211; in a moment of pure, unadulterated cliche &amp;#8211; and then promptly gets killed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Actually, the most interesting character is the Culture analyst, Fal Shilde &amp;#8216;Ngeestra dam Crose, who pops in and out of the novel in between the action set-pieces.  Through Fal we get an idea of what makes The Culture tick and there is something genuinely interesting about a society that&amp;#8217;s been able to create, on the surface, a workable utopia.  But like the rest of the novel, her &amp;#8216;story&amp;#8217; gets bogged down in Bank&amp;#8217;s need to speak from the pulpit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What I found interesting was how many reviewers found &lt;em&gt;Consider Phlebas&lt;/em&gt; to be fast paced.******  And I think this comes down to how you approach Hollywood-type blockbuster moments, such as the collapse of the Mega-ship, or Horza&amp;#8217;s escape from the massive Vavatch orbital.  There&amp;#8217;s no doubt these are &amp;#8216;jaw dropping&amp;#8217; ideas against a massive backdrop.  But Banks&amp;#8217; reduces these moments to the dull and mundane through over description and by milking as much as he can from each scene.  It&amp;#8217;s a CGI overload, just in prose.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All the negatives aside, I can see why this novel would have captured the imagination of those SF fans in 1987 who had graduated from E.E Doc Smith.  Banks is quite smart in retaining the signifiers of space opera &amp;#8211; the laser guns, the galaxy spanning wars, the massive space-ships, while also adding meat and gristle to the universe.  The cannibal scene, as much as I hated it, is there both as a contrast to the smiley face cleanliness of The Culture*******, and to show that Space Opera has grown up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This won&amp;#8217;t be the last Culture novel I read.  I&amp;#8217;m aware that novels such as &lt;em&gt;Player of Games&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Use of Weapons&lt;/em&gt; are considered to be the better novels.  But I can&amp;#8217;t pretend that I wasn&amp;#8217;t disappointed with my first taste of the Culture-verse.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* You can read the full post &lt;a href=&quot;http://everythingisnice.wordpress.com/2013/01/22/a-worm-in-the-well-by-gregory-benford/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; &amp;#8211; but really you should be reading the blog.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;** The same can be said for about 1,500 unread books that now live in my garage in four bookcases.  It&amp;#8217;s amazing what you find when you&amp;#8217;re unpacking boxes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** A theme from their earlier Coode Street episodes that while their might be a canon, that doesn&amp;#8217;t mean you need to read it to be considered a well read fan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;**** Yes, I know the book was written by Banks in 1984 and then heavily re-worked for its publication in 1987.  But the book does jump around which makes it feel like a bunch of short stories that have been woven together.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;***** Christ that section is shit and a bit racist.  You could lose it all and the novel would be 15 times better.  That&amp;#8217;s a precise calculation by the way.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;****** Have a look &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pajiba.com/book_reviews/consider-phlebas-by-iain-m-banks.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pajiba.com/book_reviews/consider-phlebas-by-iain-m-banks.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;******* Who I haven&amp;#8217;t really discussed at any length in this review, but that maybe because The Culture itself becomes background noise to everything else in the novel.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=1516&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/243343.html</comments>
  <category>coode street</category>
  <category>iain m banks</category>
  <category>abigail nussbaum</category>
  <category>martin lewis</category>
  <category>gary wolfe</category>
  <category>everything is nice</category>
  <category>jonathan strahan</category>
  <category>book review</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>10</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/243095.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:06:14 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Libraries Must Go!!!!!!</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/243095.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m about two weeks behind on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/feb/13/libraries-horrible-histories-terry-deary?CMP=twt_gu&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Terry Deary&amp;#8217;s support for the closure of libraries&lt;/a&gt;, but I thought I&amp;#8217;d unpack a couple of his more stupid comments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8220;I&amp;#8217;m not attacking libraries, I&amp;#8217;m attacking the concept behind libraries, which is no longer relevant,&amp;#8221; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And why is that Terry?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8220;Because it&amp;#8217;s been 150 years, we&amp;#8217;ve got this idea that we&amp;#8217;ve got an entitlement to read books for free, at the expense of authors, publishers and council tax payers. This is not the Victorian age, when we wanted to allow the impoverished access to literature. We pay for compulsory schooling to do that,&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, is Terry saying that impoverished people don&amp;#8217;t exist anymore?  Or is it that impoverished people only deserve to read the books that the public school system gives them when they&amp;#8217;re kids?  Because according to Terry if you want to read on your own time you&amp;#8217;re gonna pay for that fucking privilege!  And by the way, what about school libraries?  Are we shutting them down as well?*&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8220;People have to make the choice to buy books. People will happily buy a cinema ticket to see Roald Dahl&amp;#8217;s Matilda, and expect to get the book for free. It doesn&amp;#8217;t make sense.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Terry, when was the last time you walked into a library.  I mean I haven&amp;#8217;t been in one for years and even I know you can borrow DVDs. So not only can you read &lt;em&gt;Matilda&lt;/em&gt; for free you can watch it as well, if you&amp;#8217;re willing to wait a couple of months.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8220;Books aren&amp;#8217;t public property, and writers aren&amp;#8217;t Enid Blyton, middle-class women indulging in a pleasant little hobby. They&amp;#8217;ve got to make a living. Authors, booksellers and publishers need to eat. We don&amp;#8217;t expect to go to a food library to be fed.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fuck me Terry, next you&amp;#8217;ll be closing down second hand book stores because they also take money away from authors (and of course they cater to the impoverished).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8220;If I sold the book I&amp;#8217;d get 30p per book. I get six grand, and I should be getting £180,000. But never mind my selfish author perception – what about the bookshops? The libraries are doing nothing for the book industry. They give nothing back, whereas bookshops are selling the book, and the author and the publisher get paid, which is as it should be. What other entertainment do we expect to get for free?&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Terry, not sure if you&amp;#8217;re aware of this thing called the internet but since it was invented every bastard with a modem has expected shit for free.  And there&amp;#8217;s plenty of it &amp;#8211; most of it entertainment based.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And to say that libraries do nothing for bookshops is an astonishing comment.  Libraries are where children, like me, learn to love books.  And once you&amp;#8217;re bitten by the book bug, well&amp;#8230; dear Terry should have a peek inside my garage and see how many of the buggers I own.  All because of libraries.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And that&amp;#8217;s why authors have been so supportive, because unlike Terry they understand the function of these wonderful institutions.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8220;Bookshops are closing down&amp;#8230; because someone is giving away the product they are trying to sell. What other industry creates a product and allows someone else to give it away, endlessly? The car industry would collapse if we went to car libraries for free use of Porsches … Librarians are lovely people and libraries are lovely places, but they are damaging the book industry. They are putting bookshops out of business, and I&amp;#8217;m afraid we have to look at what place they have in the 21st century.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;They are putting bookshops out of business&amp;#8230;&lt;/em&gt; that&amp;#8217;s the bit I simply don&amp;#8217;t understand, because it could only come from someone who only has a vague idea of how the real world works. Libraries have fuck all to do with the closure of bookstores.  How about the mis-management of chain bookstores from idiot multinationals, or the ebook seeing people download their novels rather than buy a paper version, or torrenting &amp;#8211; you know, people illegally getting books for free rather than going to libraries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Given that he&amp;#8217;s written over 200 books and sold over 25 million books, I think Terry feels he&amp;#8217;s protecting the interest of other authors who aren&amp;#8217;t as well off as he probably is.  But his comments read like a greedy Scrooge who covets every dollars and has real entitlement issues.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*By the way, I owe Terrance Dicks a fortune.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=1138&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/243095.html</comments>
  <category>stupid shit that authors say</category>
  <category>terry deary</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>5</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/242940.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:41:59 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>The Oscars Fall Out</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/242940.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Last night Jules and I had fellow Shooting the Poo podcasters, Mitch and Dave (and Emma), over to watch the Oscars.  (Mostly in fast forward).*&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because Jules and I and the rest of us were on a social media blackout we weren&amp;#8217;t aware of the numerous controversies that erupted following the Oscars.  I&amp;#8217;m not going to repeat what others have said** but I am going to offer my insights.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First off, offensive shit aside (has anyone seen &lt;em&gt;Family Guy&lt;/em&gt;?) MacFarlane was terrible.  The Shatner bit was funny for the first two minutes but went on forever.  Ted&amp;#8217;s Jewish gags were  topical in 1972 and, worst off all, he kept on chuckling after his gags &amp;#8211; that self congratulatory pat on the back.  It was the worst sort of clichéd stand up comedy.  The only saving grace is he didn&amp;#8217;t make a men are from Mars / women are from Venus gag.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for the Onion calling a nine year old POC a cunt.  Well first off, can someone &amp;#8211; possibly the 500 or so sheep who retweeted the comment &amp;#8211; explain the joke to me?  Because no matter how many times I&amp;#8217;ve read it, I just don&amp;#8217;t see what&amp;#8217;s been parodied.  But you know maybe I&amp;#8217;m missing something.***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And second off, I&amp;#8217;m getting oh so tired of the internet apology.  Yeah, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/25/4028116/the-onion-apologizes-vulgar-tweet-quvenzhane-wallis&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Onion apology is OK&lt;/a&gt; but it doesn&amp;#8217;t come from the person who wrote the shitty tweet.  I want to hear from him or her.  I want some honesty.  I want to know whether they stand by their &amp;#8216;gag&amp;#8217;, whether they think people are being too sensitive, whether they were angry when The Onion decided to take the tweet down.  I want to know whether they feel they should apologise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because until we have that discussion, until we understand why someone would tweet something like that  &amp;#8211; unless they are a genuine bastard &amp;#8211; we get no closer to understanding why this shit keeps happening again and again. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anywho, expect the annual Shooting The Poo Oscars&amp;#8217; episode &amp;#8211; where I&amp;#8217;ll probably repeat most of what I&amp;#8217;ve said here &amp;#8211; shortly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*Jules did the smart thing of recording the live transmission on Foxtel so we wouldn&amp;#8217;t need to sit through the very dull acceptance speeches.  And she made yummy dip.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;** However the Salon have a number of good articles on both the Seth MacFarlane and Onion issues &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/don’t_blame_seth_macfarlane/?source=newsletter&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_onions_hipster_racism/?source=newsletter&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/seth_macfarlane_saw_your_boobs/?source=newsletter&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://nkjemisin.com/2013/02/fantasy-fans-wheres-your-outrage/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Oh and this excellent post from N.K. Jemisin.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** I&amp;#8217;m not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=806&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/242940.html</comments>
  <category>n.k. jemisin</category>
  <category>the oscars</category>
  <category>shooting the poo</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>4</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/242661.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:14:59 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Happy Purim and Last Short Story</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/242661.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/20130224-194623.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/20130224-194623.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;20130224-194623.jpg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is Zorro preparing for some &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purim&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Purim&lt;/a&gt; shenanigans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And as a very late Purim gift, here&amp;#8217;s a link to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://lastshortstory.podbean.com/2013/02/18/episode-2-the-magazine-of-fantasy-science-fiction-jan-feb-2013/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Last Short Story podcast&lt;/a&gt; Jonathan and I did last week.  The episode felt good when we were recording it, so I hope you enjoy it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other than that &amp;#8211; HAPPY PURIM!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=758&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/242661.html</comments>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/242255.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:04:02 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Big Finish Redux</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/242255.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=751&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;So earlier this week I wrote a post suggesting that Big Finish might consider approaching more female writers for their main range&lt;/a&gt;.*&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gallifreybase.com/forum/showthread.php?t=159627&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Anywho, a poster named &amp;#8220;The Ray&amp;#8221; (whomever he might be) decided to link to my post on Gallifrey Base, and that started a 5 page thread on the issue.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For those who decide to check out the link (I think you need to be a member of the forum to read it) you&amp;#8217;ll see that the thread quickly gets derailed, then put back on the rails and then derailed again.  I&amp;#8217;m sure by the end of it you could fill out a good chunk of the relevant Bingo Card.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the suggestions was that I contact Big Finish with my crazy idea of them approaching female writers.  I did.  Through twitter.  I&amp;#8217;ve yet to receive response.  And to be frank, I don&amp;#8217;t expect to.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One thing that shat me about the thread was the idea that female writers approach Big Finish and ask to pitch for the main range.  Putting aside the fact that Big Finish is, for the most part, a closed shop that solicits rather than receives cold pitches, shouldn&amp;#8217;t the obligation be on them to seek out more diverse voices?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I suppose what it comes to is how much they actually give a crap about gender diversity.  As The Ray pointed out, given the progressive nature of the main character &amp;#8211; the poster boy for social justice &amp;#8211; you&amp;#8217;d think Big Finish would make an effort to address this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And maybe they will.  Let&amp;#8217;s see.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* According to the stats, 95% of the stories since the new production team have been written by men.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=755&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/242255.html</comments>
  <category>big finish</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>1</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/242173.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:45:53 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Shooting the Poo Episode 21</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/242173.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://shootingthepoo.posterous.com/episode-21-louis-theroux&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I forgot to mention that we released episode 21 of Shooting the Poo a week or so back.&lt;/a&gt;  I shouldn&amp;#8217;t have forgotten because it&amp;#8217;s a fucking great episode. It helps that the source material &amp;#8211; that would be Louis&amp;#8217; docos &amp;#8211; are so good.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So go listen.  Be educated.  And be entertained.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And, you know, feedback would be nice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=754&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/242173.html</comments>
  <category>shooting the poo</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/241783.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:44:50 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Comics wot I like</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/241783.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;The New 52 has for the most part been a bit rubbish in terms of the titles it&amp;#8217;s produced,* but it did get me back into comics.  And that&amp;#8217;s a good thing, because otherwise I&amp;#8217;d have missed the titles I&amp;#8217;m going to recommend below.  These are also the comics I&amp;#8217;m going to be putting on my Hugo ballot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Saga&lt;/em&gt; (writer Brian K Vaughan / artist Fiona Staples) &amp;#8211; Believe the hype, this is one cool science fiction comic.  Imaginative, violent, funny, dark and beautifully drawn by Fiona Staples.  And if it isn&amp;#8217;t nominated for Best Graphic Story then I&amp;#8217;m not sure what the point of the category is.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Rachel Rising&lt;/em&gt; (writer and artist Terry Moore) &amp;#8211; Where have you been in my life Terry?  Apparently you won a whole slew of awards while I was ignoring comics.  &lt;em&gt;Rachel Rising&lt;/em&gt; not only has his lovely black and white art, the story of possession and resurrection and all sorts of dark stuff is compelling.  I especially love Moore&amp;#8217;s use of silence between panels (I&amp;#8217;m not sure of the technical terminology).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Hawkeye&lt;/em&gt; (writer Matt Fraction /artist David Aja) &amp;#8211; By far the best ongoing superhero comic out there (&lt;em&gt;Daredevil&lt;/em&gt; is good, but &lt;em&gt;Hawkeye&lt;/em&gt; is a step above).  Fraction is an interesting writer.  His later issues of &lt;em&gt;Iron Man&lt;/em&gt; were OK without being great and I&amp;#8217;m not convinced of his take on &lt;em&gt;FF&lt;/em&gt; after Hickman&amp;#8217;s wonderful run.  But by jiminy he has nailed Hawkeye.  And he&amp;#8217;s done it by taking Clint away from his Avengers world and showing us the sort of person he is when he&amp;#8217;s doing his thing at home.  Aja&amp;#8217;s art is astonishing, all rectangular and sharp and clean and dynamic.**  The tone is perfect, the humour spot on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Manhattan Projects&lt;/em&gt; (writer Jonathan Hickman / artist Nick Pitarra).  The true story of what happened during the development of the A-Bomb except so much more crazy and surreal than you could possibly imagine.  Hickman is a genius (I&amp;#8217;m beginning to really love his work on &lt;em&gt;Avengers&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;New Avengers&lt;/em&gt; and he has the sort of imagination suited for comics.  With &lt;em&gt;The Manhattan Projects&lt;/em&gt; he lets his imagination off the fucking leash.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Glory&lt;/em&gt; (writer Joe Keatinge / artist Ross Campbell) I never read the original Glory, as created by Rob Liefeld, but the word on the street is that I wasn&amp;#8217;t missing anything.***  Keatinge has taken the character and made it into a super violent space opera &amp;#8211; a bit like Saga actually.  It&amp;#8217;s fantastic, kinetic stuff and I&amp;#8217;m sad that Keatinge and Campbell are finishing their run in March.  (Though I appreciate that they&amp;#8217;re not dragging out the series for the sake of churning out another issue).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Actually, any Image comic &amp;#8211; like &lt;em&gt;Prophet&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Nowhere Men&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Storm Dogs&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Planetary&lt;/em&gt; is worth your time.****  But the five above are my faves.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And if you&amp;#8217;re looking for recommendations, check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://angriest.blogspot.com.au/2013/02/the-pull-list-6-february-2013.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Grant&amp;#8217;s Pull List&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readaboutcomics.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Greg McElhatton&amp;#8217;s comic&amp;#8217;s blog&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* There&amp;#8217;s always exceptions like &lt;em&gt;Batman&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Batgirl&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Batwoman&lt;/em&gt; and&amp;#8230; er&amp;#8230; &lt;em&gt;Action Comics&lt;/em&gt; has had its moments.  (I also have a thing for &lt;em&gt;Animal Man&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Swamp Thing&lt;/em&gt; but the Rotworld stuff hasn&amp;#8217;t turned me on).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;** I know less than shit about comic book art.  So I apologise if my descriptive terms make no sense or aren&amp;#8217;t event remotely reflective of the actual art style.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** Alan Moore also had a crack with Glory but I haven&amp;#8217;t read that run either&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;**** Oh and &lt;em&gt;Mudman&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8230; don&amp;#8217;t forget Mudman, it&amp;#8217;s awesome!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=753&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/241783.html</comments>
  <category>rachel rising</category>
  <category>glory</category>
  <category>the manhattan projects</category>
  <category>saga</category>
  <category>hawkeye</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>4</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/241508.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 01:51:36 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Chicks Unravel Time and Big Finish</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/241508.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;I intended to do a full review of &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Chicks-Unravel-Time-Journey-Through/dp/1935234129&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Chicks Unravel Time&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; a few months back.  But following an unhelpful bout of apathy (not towards the book, but towards reviewing and blogging in general) all my brilliant thoughts about &lt;em&gt;Chicks Unravel Time&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt; faded away like a resolved temporal paradox.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Genius thoughts aside, it is a great collection of essays and if you have any love for the Doctor then you should buy it immediately.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ve also been listening to quite a bit of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bigfinish.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Big Finish&lt;/a&gt; recently. The quality varies from the excellent to the bit rubbish, but overall I find the plays worth my time and my cash.  In fact I buy most of what Big Finish produces including the Main Range to the Companion Chronicles to the wonderful Jago and Litefoot series.*  However, one thing I have noticed though is how few women actually write for the main Doctor Who range (or any of the spin-offery).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A quick check of the main Doctor Who range indicates that the last full story written by a woman was Jacqueline Rayner in August 2008.  Since then Emma Beeby has written a full story (in September 2011) though with co-author Gordon Rennie.  I should also note that both Beeby and Catherine Harvey have written one episode stories since 2008.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A quick skim of the Table of Contents of &lt;em&gt;Chicks Unravel Time&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt; demonstrates how many professional female writers love Doctor Who.  There&amp;#8217;s Diana Gabaldon, Barbara Hambly, Seanan McGuire,  Una McCormack, Juliet E. McKenna, Tansy Rayner Roberts, Sarah Lotz, Martha Wells, Joan Frances Turner, Mags Halliday, Kelly Hale, Amal El-Mohtar, K. Tempest Bradford, Rachel Swirsky and Aliette de Bodard. And while none of them may actually be interested in writing a Big Finish audio, I think they&amp;#8217;d all be more than capable (apologies if that sounds patronising).**&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, I&amp;#8217;m not saying that Nick Briggs, Alan Barnes, David Richardson and whomever else commissions the stories are sexist.  Given that they produce one Doctor Who play a month and a slew of spin-offery, it&amp;#8217;s no surprise that they go back to writers who they can trust.  It just so happens that those writers, like Jonathan Morris and Marc Platt, are blokes.  It&amp;#8217;s not a matter of choosing guys over gals, it&amp;#8217;s a matter off expediency.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That said, I put it to Big Finish, as part of their forward planning, that maybe it&amp;#8217;s time to open the doors to more female writers.  Writers who love the show, who appreciate its flaws and its quirks, who truly understand those moments that made us fall in love with Doctor Who in the first place.  Because diversity in voice will ensure that Big Finish thrives, whether the show is on TV or not.***  And the brilliant &lt;em&gt;Chicks Unravel Time&lt;/em&gt; is a good place to start.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;UPDATED TO ADD:&lt;/strong&gt; Una McCormack notes on Twitters that she has two plays coming out from Big Finish shortly.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/gallifrey-v-update&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;They are an episode of Gallifrey Season 5 that has just come out &lt;/a&gt; and a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bigfinish.com/releases/v/the-liberator-chronicles-volume-5-739&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Blake 7 story due for release later in the year.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also pointed out on Twitter by Mags Halliday is that only five women ever wrote for the pre-New Who book range (the New, Past Doctor and Eighth Doctor Adventures).  Three of those women were commissioned by Justin Richards (and included Mags).****   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*And the rest, of course.  I highly recommend the Blake 7 Chronicles and if you&amp;#8217;re a fan of StarGate the SG1 audios are good fun.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;** There are also the fans like L.M. Myles and Liz Barr, who&amp;#8217;ve written some wonderful fan fiction in the past and show in their essays how much they understand and love the show.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** I haven&amp;#8217;t mentioned the elephant in the room, that is the lack of female representation on both the Old and New Series.  It&amp;#8217;s a given that I&amp;#8217;d love to see more women writing for the New Series.  However, in the short term I think there&amp;#8217;s more chance of this happening with Big Finish then on the telly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;**** &amp;#8230; and Kate Orman, Llyod Rose, Kelly Hale and Jac Rayner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=751&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/241508.html</comments>
  <category>chicks unravel time</category>
  <category>big finish</category>
  <category>doctor who</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/241162.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Cutting my way through the Saw Films</title>
  <author>ianmond@tpg.com.au</author>  <link>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/241162.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Hilarious pun, don&amp;#8217;t you think?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the last few weekends I&amp;#8217;ve been viewing my way through the Saw films.  I&amp;#8217;ve now seen them all except for the last and I gotta say they are a heap of fun to watch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m a splatterpunk fan from way back &amp;#8211; both in film and literature.*  And while I&amp;#8217;d never say that I find blood and guts, chopped off limbs and sloppy organs a bit sexy, there&amp;#8217;s something about the silliness of it all that I find entertaining.**  And Saw does some really good gore.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But that&amp;#8217;s only a small part of what makes the Saw films so much fun to watch (including Saw 5, which is utter bollocks on a number of levels).  No, the real fun is watching the writers pull a number of plot rabbits out of their arses as each movie (except for 5) adds to the convoluted and completely nonsensical backstory.  But that&amp;#8217;s OK because it makes each of the climactic revelations and plot twists (some of them genuinely clever, such as the twist for 4) all the more funnier.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you can deal with the gore and Costas Mandylor&amp;#8217;s*** acting (mostly from movie 4) then the Saw films are worth the time.***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* Completely off topic but &lt;em&gt;PIG&lt;/em&gt; by Gorman Bechard, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/700448.Splatterpunks_II&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;which featured in Splatterpunks 2&lt;/a&gt; is the greatest splatterpunk story ever written.  Yes, even better than Lansdale&amp;#8217;s &lt;em&gt;Night They Missed the Horror Show&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;** It&amp;#8217;s no coincidence that the best splatterpunk stories, like those two above, are also fucking hilarious.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** It&amp;#8217;s OK though because Tobin Bell more then makes up for the pain of watching Mandylor try to emote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;**** I did appreciate the Saw 6&amp;#8242;s critique of the American healthcare system, given that the original writers of the franchise were Australian and the films &amp;#8211; though set in the US &amp;#8211; are a joint production with Canada.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: right&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondyboy.com/?p=750&quot; title=&quot;Read Original Post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Hysterical Hamster&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://mondyboy.livejournal.com/241162.html</comments>
  <category>the saw films</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>4</lj:reply-count>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
